OCTOBER 18 / DYNAMO JAKK

Using Attorney as a Private Lawyer under Private International Law

People at times believe that the “system” is rigged against them and there is nothing that they can do. While this statement is generally true, there is another layer to it. The system is only rigged against you as long as you do not understand how the system works. Most of the people do not understand how the system works and how they can use this very system to get access to their God given rights. 

For instance, most people do not know how from their birth an artificial legal entity i.e., a strawman is created in their name, which enables the State to exercise its law upon the strawman and by extension on the person being represented by the strawman. A few steps can make you take back control of your life, but many people simply are not aware of this.

This lack of knowledge is what leads us to believe that we have a right to something when in reality we have no such right, nor should we. The reason why a lot of things that we at times disapprove of, happen in this world is because our understanding of matters is not profound enough to allow us to exert any influence. Such is the case when it comes to legal matters in particular. A lot of people are simply not aware of their rights and of the laws applicable on them. It is this lack of knowledge and awareness on part of the common man and woman that the “system” uses against us.

The same force that protects your rights, which is the Constitution of the United States of America, protects the rights of the judges, prosecutors, and others. For you to win, you must learn how to apply the proper rules of procedure, of law, and of evidence. For example, if you do not properly apply the rules of evidence, then the judge or jury can throw out your evidence, or you can be found guilty of perjury.

Right to Legal Counsel

“[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right . . . to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.”

The 6th amendment to the U.S constitution ensures the right to an attorney in criminal proceedings. The courts cannot charge a person with a criminal offence unless and until they have been offered legal counsel, if they cannot afford one.

The Strawman

At this point we must make it absolutely clear that from the time your birth is registered and you are issued a birth certificate, a strawman entity is created to represent you in all legal matters. This strawman entity is an artificial legal person and the state uses this strawman entity for commercial purposes which we have covered in previous posts. Similarly, whenever any person is about to be charged for a criminal offence, the courts have to in reality charge the strawman entity.

The courts cannot charge the actual natural person, since no direct contract exists between a natural person and the state. The person is bound indirectly to the system through the strawman entity representing them. In simple words the state has a contract with the strawman.

So, the courts have to charge the strawman and since the person is linked with the strawman, the charge is indirectly levied on the person. Now this whole system depends mainly on two things.

  • Voluntary consent of the person
  • Assumptions, presumptions and conclusions underpinning the system

The voluntary consent is manufactured unknowingly and thus the system works without any flaw. The courts make the offer of legal counsel or attorney in the form of a commercial draft. This makes the court, the offeror of a draft and the person due to be charged as the acceptor of a draft.
This in legal terms is similar to the situation where you present a valid bank draft to a bank. The bank has to honor the financial instrument. If it refuses to honor a valid financial instrument, the bank stands in dishonor and contempt.

Similarly, when the courts offer legal counsel in the form of a commercial draft, you are the banker and thus you have to accept the offer or risk contempt. Accepting the offer creates an honorable relationship between the person to be charged and the court, government and attorneys involved. Refusal of the offer makes one stand in contempt of court.

Consent is the first dependency and unfortunately there is no way to refuse this offer. But there is a way to deal with the second dependency by using the system itself. Let us look at it now.

Letter of Rogatory

The offer for legal counsel must be accepted with written consent. The consent is given in the form of a simple contract with acceptance of value and return for value, mentioned over it along with the credentials of the person to be charged. This contract establishes the person to be charged as a “creditor” who has honored the commercial draft offered by the court.

The next step is to have the state appointed attorney address whatever the person to be charged wants to have addressed. This is done through a letter of rogatory.

The letter of rogatory in technical terms is a “private” letter from an official of one court to another court, where there is an issue of jurisdiction between the two courts. For instance, David who lives in France, allegedly commits a crime against Marcus who lives in the USA. Then the courts in the USA cannot legally interrogate David. In this case the US court would send a letter of rogatory to the relevant court in France to interrogate David and obtain evidence and transmit it back to the US.

In this instance, the government is the foreign entity making the courts foreign as well. The whole “system” that we mentioned earlier is set up as a corporation for profit. The strawman serves a commercial purpose, as we have discussed in previous blogs.

For this purpose, the most appropriate way to use the system against itself is to use the letter of rogatory, to help the foreign court officiate the charges against the fictitious strawman entity.

The letter of rogatory is the instrument that can be used to bring your rights as a natural person into the court vis a vis the strawman entity.

A sample of a letter of rogatory is presented below.

Mary Jane Doe <Living Sole’s Name>

123 Main Street Anytown, Michigan 4xxxxx

LETTER ROGATORY

June 1,20XX

<Public Defender’s Name>

<Public Defender’s Corp>

<Public Defender’s Address>

<PubIic Defender’s City-State-ZIP>

RE: Acceptance of appointment of counsel and request for service IN CASE NO: <2003000xxx>, <Court Name>

Dear Sir:

Please be advised that I humbly accept your appointment as per the court appointment in the STATE OF MICHIGAN, CASE NO: <2003000xxx>, <Court Name>.

I request that you perform the following on behalf of the undersigned:

  1. Do not argue any facts on the public side of the above matter in behalf of the undersigned. The well pled facts are all true therein and not disputed. To dispute the facts takes away my ability to dispute the substance of the presumptions in Fact.

  2. Represent the undersigned only on the private side of the matter as per my directions herein and any subsequent directions.

  3. Secure for the undersigned a personal appearance bond or personal recognizance bond without public charge and without public fees or costs so that I can plead to the charging instrument as my remedy in this matter in law, not equity.

  4. It is my intent to plead guilty to the facts in the charging instrument and not to controvert any of the well pled facts therein, which are all true.

  5. In return, I request that this court discharge the appearance bond to the undersigned at the termination and closure and settlement of this matter.

  6. I also request that any and all public or private costs, fees, charges, and restitution that might come out of this court as any orders in this matter be discharged by exchange of my exemption for settlement and closure, which I hereby authorize under exemption number <EIN number of strawman>.

  7. I request that any and all charging instruments in this matter affecting the undersigned be accepted by you under your signature for and in the behalf of the undersigned and returned to this court for settlement and closure forthwith. If my signature is required on the acceptance, I request that these instruments be delivered to me forthwith for my signature. I request that you direct that these signed and noted instruments be filed on the public side of this court’s record.

  8. If this court fails to issue an appearance bond to the undersigned under the requested terms of the above paragraph 3, I request that you notify the court publicly of my acceptance of the court’s dishonor, and I will presume based upon that dishonor that the appearance bond is in FACT issued to the undersigned to secure the undersigned’s participation in this matter, or that you will direct my own bond to be filed publically in the record based on the court’s dishonor.

  9. – I request that you ask the judge in this matter in open court if he has sworn an oath of office, and if he answers in the affirmative, I further request that you ask the judge in this matter to publicly take judicial notice of the oath of office of the judge in this matter to provide to me a remedy in law.

  10. Attached hereto is an AFFIDAVIT OF NEGATIVE AVERMENT executed by the undersigned. I request that you forthwith cause this original affidavit to be filed into this court on the public side of the record with the acceptances for value and the returns for value discussed in paragraph 7, so that the court will have the benefit of the old common law pleading of confession and avoidance.

  11. I request that you direct the court to take mandatory judicial notice of the instruments tendered for public filing in the court in paragraphs 7 and 10 herein and to enter these filings into evidence at an oral hearing in behalf of the undersigned.

  12. I request that you direct the court to take mandatory judicial notice of the documents the state acquired from <list any evidence that the state might have in its possession that provides true facts to the proceedings to rebut any assumptions, presumptions, or conclusions in the charging instruments-.

  13. I do not expect that your kind services be provided without consideration. Please provide for me an invoice so that I may accept and return said invoice for value and direct that the exemption <of the strawman> be used as consideration in exchange for these services.

  14. I request that any other service that you perform for the undersigned in this matter be approved by the undersigned before said performance be undertaken.


With sincerest appreciation,

Mary-Jane: Doe, offender And agent for defendant

Enclosures:

Original of AFFIDAVIT OF NEGATIVE AVERMENT OF MARY JANE DOE.

CC:

<Name of Prosecuting Atty>, PROSECUTING ATTY <Address of Prosecuting Atty>

<City>, MI 4xxxx

CLERK OF COURTS <Name of Court>

<Address of Clerk of Courts>

<City>, MI 4xxxx.

HONORABLE <Name of Judge>, <Title>

<Name of Court>

<Address of Judge>.

<City>, MI 4xxx

NOTE:

ALL TYPING WITHIN THE < > BRACKETS ON THE PREVIOUS 2 PAGES REQUIRE MATERIAL FACT INPUT

TO COMPLETE THIS INSTRUMENT BEFORE SIGNATURE AND FILING OR SERVICE UPON MARY JANE DOE’S ATTORNEY.


The letter of rogatory has to be sent to the
  • Appointed attorney
  • Clerk
  • Judge
  • Prosecuting attorney

These copies are to be mailed using certified mail so that their receipt by the aforementioned parties can be brought forth as evidence if needed. 

The purpose of the letter of rogatory is to establish
  • Confession and
  • Avoidance

Confession is to establish that the offer of legal counsel made by the court is “acceptance for value and return for value”.

Avoidance is on the basis of the basic assumption of the court and thus the system that the natural person or the living soul is directly operating the strawman created by the system for its own profit and gain. Therefore, the legal attorney has to carry out his duty as stated in the letter of rogatory.

If the counsel does not carry out his duty of confession and avoidance, or does not accept the letter of rogatory then the court can hold him accountable and make him liable for the debts and losses of the natural person being charged.

Knowing how the system works and having knowledge of its intricacies can help you understand the method and procedures that can be used to use the system against itself. While this system leaves no room to not accept or reject the offer for legal counsel without any negative consequence, there is a way to use the letter of rogatory to force the attorneys to exploit the system to avoid the charges, while staying in honor to the courts and the system.

Samples of the Affidavit of Negative Averment and Bond tender of payment have also been attached below for reference.

AFFIDAVIT OF SPECIFIC NEGATIVE AVERMENT

RECORDING REQUESTED BY
Mary-Jane: Doe
RE: DOCKET NUMBER 1921AB111000, Tewksbury PD vs. Mary-Jane: Doe
™Mary-Jane: Doe©, Secured Party and Creditor
c/o 80 Greenfield Street
Non-Domestic
Hudson, New Hampshire [03051]
Continental America
AFFIDAVIT OF SPECIFIC NEGATIVE AVERMENT
Definitions; The term Asservant (Mary-Jane: Doe) a living sentient being possessing all the corporeal and incorporeal hereditament rights granted under the Creator, in the status de-jure National of Massachusetts. The terms I, me, my, mean Mary-Jane: Doe. The terms your\you means any and all persons d\b\a Tewksbury PD, Lowell District Court and Massachusetts District Attorney(s) any and all of their employees\principals\agents\assigns\successors\heirs\nominees who act in regard to this matter.

The term your offers means the Letter dated March 8, 2021 and October 9, 2021, NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE HEARING ON COMPLAINT APPLICATION, in regards to DOCKET NUMBER 1921AB111000 

Tewksbury PD vs Mary-Jane: Doe, which are hereby conditionally accepted for value, attached and fully incorporated herein by reference thereto. The term Proof of Claim means a signed record of assessment, affidavit of the nature and cause of the claim and underlying documents setting forth essential facts.

  1. Asservant herein Mary-Jane: Doe state that I am competent and being of the age of majority affirm that my "yes" be "yes" and my "no" be "no" and that the following facts are true, certain, correct, and not misleading under the penalty of the Creator's Law of bearing false witness, and,

  2. Asservant has not seen or been provided any evidence that Indemnifies (Average Joe) with an asset money bond for the damages you will create by enforcement of any liens and/or levies nor does Asservant believe any such evidence exists, and,

  3. Asservant has not seen or been provided any evidence that certificate proof of claim setting forth essential facts for said alleged claim, and,

  4. Asservant has not seen or been provided any evidence that his conditional acceptance of your offer, does not prove he agrees to discharge any liability associated therewith, as setforth in the Notice of Conditional Acceptance, and,

  5. Asservant has not seen or been provided any evidence that you have or can produce a signed record of assessment nor does Asservant believe any such evidence exists, and,

  6. Asservant has not seen or been provided any evidence that Asservant established an account for goods\services receivable with you which makes Asservant liable for your claim nor does Asservant believe any such evidence exists, and,

  7. Asservant has not seen or been provided any evidence that Asservant received a benefit, gain, or advantage that made Asservant liable for your claim nor does Asservant believe any such evidence exists, and,

  8. Asservant has not seen or been provided any evidence that you may lawfully interfere with private contracts made with others, and,

  9. Asservant has not seen or been provided any evidence that you are not still bound by our original contract to send all correspondence to my third party witness by stipulation of the parties, and,

  10. Asservant has not seen or been provided any evidence that you have a delegation of authority to attach levies against a (New-York) National without cause nor does Asservant believe any such evidence exists, and,

  11. Asservant has not seen or been provided any evidence that you have a delegation of authority to attempt to unlawfully convert Mary-Jane: Doe property, and,

  12. Asservant has not seen or been provided any evidence that you did not know or cannot discover that primary liability rests upon the maker of an instrument, unless the other party refuses to pay or perform, and that Asservant has NEVER refused to pay or perform nor does Asservant believe any such evidence exists, and,

  13. Asservant has not seen or been provided any evidence that this offer is NOT evidence that Asservant offered to discharge liability conditioned upon proof of claim nor does Asservant believe any such evidence exists, and,

  14. Asservant has not seen or been provided any evidence that you are not liable for the amount you are seeking by refusing to provide a certificate of proof of claim, and,

  15. Asservant has not seen or been provided any evidence that this matter has not been settled by stipulation of the parties of prior agreements and that you are not in dishonor to the first conditional acceptance leaving you with no standing to make additional offers, and,

  16. Asservant has not seen or been provided any evidence that an offer tendered in discharge of a claim and refused, does NOT discharge any liability associated with the claim nor does Asservant believe any such evidence exists, and,

  17. Asservant has not seen or been provided any evidence that you did not have prior knowledge that this matter was already settled by stipulation of the parties, and,

  18. Asservant has not seen or been provided any evidence that you have standing to make a new offer when you have had prior knowledge that you have gone into commercial dishonor by stipulation of the parties, and,

  19. Asservant has not seen or been provided any evidence that if you endorse your new claim with your signature with advance notice claims and defenses against your claim and you go into commercial dishonor, you do not become personally liable on the instrument, and,

  20. Asservant has not seen or been provided any evidence that you or the Tewksbury PD is going to provide proof of claim which will keep you in dishonor, and,

  21. Asservant has not seen or been provided any evidence that since you are in dishonor and will not provide proof of claim you are stipulating that you are responsible for any amount you allege, Further Asservant sayeth not.


    All Rights Reserved - Without Prejudice - Non Assumpsit

    Date: _________________________ By: _____________________________________                                                                                     

™Mary-Jane: Doe©, Secured Party and Creditor,
Holder in Due Course, Sole Private Beneficiary
c/o 80 Greenfield Street - Non-Domestic
Hudson, New Hampshire [03051]
Continental America

I declare under penalty of perjury that the identified named individual above appeared before me with picture identification, and acknowledged this document before me on;





Date: _____________ /s/


NOTARY PUBLIC’S JURAT

Verified Notice of Tender of Payment

  • Verified Notice of Tender of Payment

    Date of Notice: ____, A.D. 200__

    Notice served by:  Mary-Jane, family of Doe, sovereign,
                      acting as surety for MARY J. DOE at
                      Invoice No. ____
    c/o temporary mailing location:
    the General Post Office, at Dallas, on Texas

    Notice served on: Bill ____________, d/b/a BILL ____________, CITY MANAGER and FIDUCIARY
    for the CITY OF __________________
    __________________ STREET
    ________________, TX 75____________
     via Registered Mail: "___________________________"

    Reference: Your Invoice No. ____, issued on _____, A.D. 200___, at Account No. _______

    The following “Verified Notice of Tender of Payment” is made explicitly under reserve and without recourse.

    Pursuant to your Invoice No. ____, issued on _____, A.D. 200___, at Account No. ____, instructing MARY J. DOE to pay a debt in the amount of $15,000.00 to the CITY OF _____, and in accord with current Public Policy at House Joint Resolution number 192 passed by the 73rd Congress of the United States, 1st Session, on June 5, 1933 at 4:40 p.m., hereinafter referred to as “HJR-192”, with said resolution having never been repealed and still being in full force and effect and having become public policy, and in accord with my personal exemption authorized therein for the discharge of debts, I, John-William, family of Doe, sovereign, acting in good faith, with clean hands, at arm’s length, and as surety for MARY J. DOE at Invoice No. ____, hereby and herein tender payment for a debt for MARY J. DOE in the amount of $15,000.00, to discharge the said debt behind Invoice No. ____.

    In as much as no lawful money of account exists in circulation, and pursuant of current Public Policy at “HJR-192”, MARY J. DOE has no money with which to pay a debt. Because MARY J. DOE has no money with which to pay a debt, I have had to resort to using my personal exemption to discharge MARY J. DOE’S debt, and therefore, I hereby and herein tender my Registered Bond, numbered 001001, as payment of said debt, in order for MARY J. DOE to be discharged of the said debt behind Invoice No. ____.

    As you will note, my Registered Bond, numbered 001001, is the credit you need to off-set the debit shown on your books. Said bond is being issued in good faith, with clean hands and at arm’s length, and is not a dishonor of said debt.

    Please send a signed receipt to me, at the above address, acknowledging your receipt of my payment.

    Verification: I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on ____, A.D. 200___, at the county of Dallas.

    Attachment: Registered Bond, numbered 001001, signed in blue ink, dated ____, A.D. 200___, in the amount of $15,000.00, issued to the City of _____
                   

    Respectfully tendered on behalf of MARY J. DOE,
    By: Seal
                   By: Mary-Jane, family of Doe, sovereign, acting
                    as surety for MARY J. DOE at Invoice No. ____


NOTICE: This treatise constitutes neither the practice of law, nor the giving of legal advice, Information served herein is for informational and educational purposes only. Author does not consent to unlawful action. Author advocates and encourages one and all to adhere to, support and defend all LAW which is particularly applicable. You are responsible for yourself and your own actions. If you act on what you do not understand and cannot support through knowledge and ability, any adverse consequences you may experience are entirely a product of your own doing/omissions. If anything in this presentation is found to be in error a good faith effort will be made to correct it in timely fashion upon notification. VOID where prohibited by law.

Latest from our blog

Never miss the news

Stay updated | Stay current| Stay connected

Thank you!

Who Doesn't Like Free?
Explore A Range Of Amazing Free Courses

\Learnworlds\Codeneurons\Pages\ZoneRenderers\CourseCards
Created with